I will be grateful to all readers who point out errors, large and small. Small errors such as those listed below will be corrected every time the book is reprinted.
Return
to
book home page.
Send comments to marder@chaos.ph.utexas.edu
Jump to Chapter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 A
World-wide typo-finders:
Roberto Diener: has found 228 (!)
Qian Niu: has found 9
Marcus Berg: has found 9
Rena Zieve has found 5
Mickey Moore: has found 4
Erik Alldredge: has found 3
Carsten Ullrich has found 3
Dominic Holland: has found 2
Robert Jon Jorstad has found 2
Mitchell Luskin has found 2
John Carini: has found 1
Jack Swift: has found 1
Casey Miller: has found 1
Alexander Badinski has found 1
Sean Cadogan has found 1
Roberto Pasionot has found 1
Darren Peets has found 1
Scott Noble has found 1
A corrected printing was issued on February 16, 2001. The words "Corrected Printing" appear on the cover, making it easy to identify. Most of the errors identified in the first printing have been corrected. As new errors are identified, they will be recorded in the separate error pages for the first and second printing.
A number of figures lost lines due to a defect in the printing process. These figures are listed below. A proper version of each page in PostScript can be obtained by clicking on the links. Table 2.9 suffers the most; the other figures suffer only minor damage.
p. 31, Table 2.8
PostScript
p.
34, Table 2.9. PostScript
p.
35, Table 2.10 PostScript
p.
70, Figure 4.1 PostScript
p.
73, Figure 4.5 PostScript
p.
102, Figure 5.9 PostScript
p.
695, Figure 24.12 PostScript
p.
697, Figure 24.13 PostScript
p. 730, Figure
25.8 PostScript
p.
731, Figure 25.9 PostScript
p.
795, Figure 27.3 PostScript
p.
800, Figure 27,7 PostScript
p. 9, Caption to Figure 1.4, the displacement upwards is by a/2.
p. 12, line 5, the displacement upwards is by a/2.
p. 24, "they honeycomb lattice" should be "the honeycomb lattice"
p. 47, Equation (3.7). Ri should just be R.
p. 47; Comment to Eq. (3.8) says one should square Eq. (3.5) but actually one squares Eq. (3.6).
p. 47, Comment to Eq. (3.10), f should be fl.
p. 66, The Maugin abacus is printed for a plate at 2 inches rather than 1.5. Get correct figure here. (PostScript)
p. 71, Next-to-last sentence should read "Because the product of the interplanar spacing and the area per atom on the interface must be constant, interfaces with large interplanar spacings have the highest density of points on the surface."
p. 75, Eq. (4.4) should contain [energy/eV]-1/2.
p. 93, Figure (5.5), text to the right of top panel, "sold" should be "solid".
p. 97, Item 2 near bottom; chosen particle should be l not i.
p. 99, Equation (5.25) should have a factor of 1/ml on the right hand side, and in Equation (5.27) the contents of the square root should be 6 b ml kBT/dt.
p. 102, fifth line, "wave vector k" should read "wave vector \hbar k"
p. 102, Equation (5.41). For dimensional consistency, the term inside brackets should be multiplied by a scattering form factor fl, which can however be dropped from (5.42).
p. 105, seventh line "function function" should be "function"
p. 120, Equation (5.94). In the first exponential, 2 \pi nnm' should just be 2\pi m'. Before Equation (5.97), the square amplitude is proportional to (5.97), not equal to it.
p. 128, Problem 6; the problem is not posed entirely correctly. Energy must be a periodic function of angles. Since it is not, one must assume that \beta\kappa >>1, in which case angles approaching \pi can be neglected, and integrals over angles extended to infinity.
p. 137, Equation (6.3). \psi on right hand side should be \psi_l.
p. 138, sixth line from bottom. "always wants always" should be "always wants".
p. 142, Equation (6.32) is missing (for shame!) a factor of 10^8 on the right hand sides. Angstroms and cm were mixed up.
p. 142, bottom, problems 4 and 7 extend Eqs. 6.35 and 6.36 to arbitrary dimensions.
p. 144, Equation (6.40). On left hand side, product over l should begin at 1, not 0.
p. 150, Equation (6.78). T should disappear from right hand side.
p. 151. Table 6.2, moles should be inverse moles in table heading
p. 152, problem 7 n dimensions should be d dimensions.
p. 159, Equations (7.20) and (7.21). The first a3 in the denominator should be a1
p. 160, Equation (7.27), In comment to Eq. (7.27), k''=k'-k.
p. 162, Equations (7.40) and (7.41) In two dimensions, van Hove singularities also include step function discontinuities. The expression given applies at at saddle point. In three dimensions, the expression given applies at a maximum or minimum, while at a saddle two square root singularities meet in a cusp.
p. 165, Equation (7.49), iqR should be iqr.
p. 167, Equation (7.69), the sum acts on the entire left hand side.
p. 168, Figure 7.5 was in fact prepared for a one-dimensional chain, not a 3-d cubic lattice. And a good thing too, since Sk does not converge in three dimensions. Wave vectors are in units of K0=2\pi/a and energies are in units of \hbar^2K0^2/2m.
p. 169. Figure 7.6 was in fact prepared for a one-dimensional chain, not a 3-d cubic lattice.
p. 172. After (7.72) "each each" should be "each".
p. 173, last paragraph. Matrices A and B should be A(n) and A(m).
p. 174, second line, second A(m) is A(n)
p. 176, second-to-last line. \chi^(n) should be \chi^(p).
p. 182, problem 5, in part (d) also set \hbar=1.
p. 187, Equation (8.12), missing subscript k on one of the \psi's
p. 188, Example at bottom: The discontinuities are at n \pi/a with K=-2n\pi/a.
p. 193, Figure 8.4; the surfaces projected into the first Brillouin zone are on the right, not on the left.
p. 197, Equation (8.34), ik should be -ik.
p. 204, Equation (9.1), sum over l, not i. Equation (9.2). The argument of n(r) should be r'.
p. 206, Equation (9.9), leading factor is 1/\sqrt{N!}
p. 208, in line before (9.23), \psi_i should be \psi_i^*. In Equation (9.25), swap roles of \psi and \tilde \psi. Indices in Equation (9.27) are slightly messed up.
p. 211 "which diagonalized" should read "which is diagonalized"
p. 212, Equation (9.38), in final term, delta function should follow sum. Final line, wave function squared is 1/V.
p. 213, Equation (9.42), r2' should be r'as integration variable and in exponential, and change of variable is r'=r2-r.
p. 213, Equation (9.47), the leading factor of ¼ is actually 1/(4x). Lindhart should be Lindhard.
p. 216 "No knows the true F" should read "No one knows the true F"
p. 219, Equation (9.80), exchange term is missing e2.
p. 220, Equation (9.81), need to divide by 8m on right hand side, and also divide right hand side of (9.82) by same factor.
p. 222, Equation (9.92) \pi^2 should be \pi^4.
p. 225, last line K should be Ks.
p. 226, Equation (9.109). This inequality is valid only if 1=1/p+1/q.
p. 232, Equation (10.9). Multiply angular momentum term by -2, and change sign of exchange term. Do same in (10.10)
p. 233, Equation (10.10) The expression gives the difference between the pseudopotential and the Coulomb potential, instead of the pseudopotential discussed in the text. It is better to (a) multiply everything on the right by a minus sign and (b) eliminate the term e2Z/r from the right hand side.
p. 236. Equations (10.19) and (10.20), kinetic energy missing a minus sign.
p. 240, Equation (10.29) U_{K'-K} should be U_{K-K'}. Missing \hbar on rhs of (10.31)
p. 242, Equation (10.33) and (10.34). R is printed in wrong font on right hand side.
p. 242, Equation (10.36). An overall factor of 4\pi is missing.
p. 243, Equation (10.40), V is volume of unit cell, and factor of 4\pi R_H^2 should be omitted. Equation (10.41). On right hand side, k should be q. To convert from atomic units, multiply k . k' by \hbar^2/2m.
pp.
251 and 253. Figures 10.8 (b) and 10.10 are in error. Furthermore the
discussion that surrounds them does a disservice to the authors of
the program VASP that I employed to produce portions of these
figures. I owe the authors an apology. So, first, I would like to
state that VASP is not only reasonably priced, impressively fast, and
relatively easy to use, it does not make
the types of elementary errors shown in Figures 10.8 (b). The error
is mine. It is due to tracing out locations in k space
different from those labeled on the figure. When the correct k
space points are employed, the figures improve dramatically. Two
unanticipated phenomena contributed to my error. The first was a
program feature that was very sensitive to a single ill-placed blank
space in an input file. The second was a charming eagerness of
band-structure experts I consulted to assume that programs written by
others do not work properly. Corrected versions of the pages can be
obtained here:
Page 251 (PostScript,
PDF)
Page 253 (PostScript,
PDF)
p. 254. Equations (10.51) and (10.52). For consistency with text it would be preferable if all k's were replaced by q's and F replaced by U. Again V is volume of unit cell, factor of 4\pi R_H^2 should be omitted,and to convert from atomic units, multiply k .k' by \hbar^2/2m.
p. 264, Figure (11.1). Sodium and chlorine are interchanged in the figure caption. All the electrons sit on the chlorine, and the sodium is invisible.
p. 265, Equation (11.3), \hat r should appear rather than \hat n, and this is a unit vector, not a unit normal.
p. 273, Equation (11.28), electrostatic binding energy should be negative.
p. 275 Equation (11.34) U_0 is set to Ze2/Rc .
p. 276 Equation (11.38), replace .829 by .667 and .909 by .871. Final column of Table 11.10 must be adjusted by around 10%.
p. 277, Equation (11.41) divide u0 by a.
p. 278, Equation (11.43) First factor of Ek0 should be negative. (11.44) Factor of Ek0 inside square root must be squared.
p. 279, "shape aof" is "shape of"
p. 282, bottom paragraph, arguments of inverse cosine are unit vectors.
p. 284, Equation (11.55). The leading 1/R should be removed, and the first term in brackets should be divided by R5.
p. 287, Equation (12.2) should have overall factor of ½.
p. 288, In Equations (12.5), (12.8) and (12.10), rightmost E, must reverse \gamma and \delta.
p. 289, Equation (12.12) Indices \gamma\delta on \sigma should be \alpha\beta.
p. 291, Equation (12.23) First term is "sum of eaa" all squared.
p. 295, Equation (12.38), missing vector sign on right hand side.
p. 297, (12.52e) should have factor of ½.
p. 300, before Equation (12.65) t decreases to t R02/R2.
p. 303, Brady and Clauser (1991). The Hand@Book is a Handbook
p. 306, "an Taylor expansion" is "a Taylor expansion"
p. 313, Equation (13.29) f2--f1 should be f1--f2.
p. 315, Equation (13.37). In both parts of equation, reverse sign of k in exponential. The starred \epsilon should be in (a), not (b).
p. 317, Equation (13.45) missing factor of \hbar on left.
p. 322, Equation (13.70), factor of T over Debye temperature must be cubed!
p. 325, in Equations (13.80) and (13.81), what is being calculated is V\beta, not \beta.
p. 329, Figure 13.15 is restricted to the case k' = 0.
pp. 331 and 332, In Equations (13.96) through (13.100) the roles of k' and k are reversed.
p. 332, Equation (13.106), large sum should be in numerator.
p. 334, Equation (13.121) leading factor is 3/4, not 3/2.
p. 335, Equation (13.125), no leading minus sign in first exponential.
p. 336, in section 13.4.5, \vec q should just be q.
p. 338, Equation (13.132), factor of 3/2 should be 3/4. Figure 13.19(A), swap labels --1/2 and 1/2 in the lower part of the figure; note that the g factors for the ½ and 3/2 levels have opposite signs, so the levels have to be ordered differently.
p. 353, Equation (14.21) should have a leading 1/2. It is preferable to remove minus sign in Equation (14.22), and add extra minus sign in exponential in Equation (14.24).
p. 354, Before Equation (14.29) and in sum (14.33) k' should be k.
p. 356, Missing factor of 1/4 in Equations (14.45) through (14.47).
p. 361, Equation (14.61), lower limits of integrals are a not 0. Equation (14.65), r dr should be r2 dr.
p. 362, Equation (14.70). Must add 1 to last term on right hand side.
p. 365, Equation (14.76), put equals sign after \delta. Equation (14.77), replace factor of 2 by coefficient of order unity that depends upon nature of loading.
p. 366, Equation (14.81) holds for \phi^\prime, not \phi. Equation (14.83), r derivatives are t derivatives.
p. 368, Equation (14.99), extra factor of 2 in numerator in last two terms. After (14.100), K=\sqrt{2\pi}\mu\Sigma
p. 369, time interval in second paragraph is a/v, not t/a.
p. 371, after (14.112), stress is 2 \Sigma \mu... not 4\Sigma \mu.
p. 372, part (c), 2N=1 should be 2N+1.
p. 373, Baumeister (1978), The Hand@Book is a Handbook.
p. 377, before Equation (15.12) reference to Eq. (12.23) should be to (12.28).
p. 382, after Equation (15.26), Stokes drag is 6\pi\eta R.
p. 383, Equations (15.33) and (15.34), interchange t and t^\prime in exponential. Add minus sign and factor of 1/V on rhs of Eq. (15.39)
pp. 384 and 385, missing factor of 1/V in Equations (15.49) and (15.50). Before (15.50) define the complex shear modulus to be G*=--i\omega\eta, defining \eta(\omega) to be the coefficient of \exp[--i\omega t].
p. 393, Equation (15.76), missing minus sign on right hand side.
p. 394, Equation (15.81), vector sign over \rho rather than v. Equation (15.83), need minus sign on lhs. Eliminate grad^2 from (15.87b)
p. 400, Equation (15.109) assumes that the superfluid flow is parallel to the momentum \vec Pof the vortex.
p. 401, Equation (14.114) No complex conjugate on last \Psi
p. 402, Equation (15.121) \mu N should just be \mu. Equation (15.123), \phi should be \psi.
p. 404. Three missing minus signs...on rhs of (15.128), before v^\prime y in (15.30), and in exponent of (15.131). Equation (15.133) missing factor of m.
p. 406, Equation (15.146) u is v.
p. 407, Equation (15.149) \theta is \phi; in sentence following, velocity and vorticity are continuous, not constant.
p. 408, part (d), the coefficient of \gamma_q^\dag\gamma_{--q}^\dag is what needs to vanish.
p. 409, Demircan et al is in volume 54, not 14.
p. 416, Equation (16.17) Missing factor of 2 on right hand side.
p. 423, Equation (16.44) should have factor of 2 inside square root.
p. 425, Equation (16.64), take square root of term involving effective masses.
p. 426, Equation (16.66) (irrelevant) missing exp[i rc (k^\prime -- k)] in third term.
p. 427, Equation (16.71), rc and r interchanged in exponential.
p. 428, Equation (16.82c) Rkc should be multiplied by ukc*.
p. 429, Item 3 and Equation (16.87) 2\pi\hbar T should be 2\pi\hbar / T.
p. 430, Equation (16.89b), rhs is \hbar R. Equation (16.90) is missing (e/2mc)B.L.
p. 432, Equation (16.100), reverse sign of right hand side.
p. 433, Equation (16.103) can have additional term proportional to B as r need not be perpendicular to B. No later calculations are affected.
p. 434, Equation (19.109a), missing factor of A in first term on left.
p. 439, Eq (16.122); instead of asking for W to be an eigenfunction of the momentum operator P, it should instead be an eigenfunction of the translation operator TR* =\exp[i P . R/\hbar] with eigenvalue \exp[i k . R].
p. 440, Eq (16.124); there should be a vector sign over the rightmost r. In Eq (16.125) the final term on the right needs an extra minus sign.
p. 443 Equation (17.3b) is missing an \hbar on the left hand side.
p. 449 In Eq. (17.32), the energy E should be E/N.
p. 452 Eqs. (17.46) and (17.47) j_\beta should be \sigma_{\alpha\beta}. (17.51) is missing e2.
p. 454 Formatting error in Eq. (17.59)
p. 455 Eq. (17.76); the Lorenz number should not have a T.
p. 457 After Eq. (17.80) "is is" should be "is." On rhs of (17.82) n is j.
p. 461 Eq. (17.97), given coordinate system in Fig 17.4, R is negative of what is defined.
p. 465 Before (17.105) omit words "indexoccupation number" Excess braces Eq. (17.107) and excess \alpha in (17.108). In (17.109) fkk' is ukk'.
p. 466, Equations (17.110--112), first exponential should have positive sign.
p. 467, Equations (17.117) and (17.118) are missing some factors of 1/\hbar.
p. 468, Eq. (17.134) is missing factor of \delta f_k on E^0. Ignore comment to (17.135)
p. 469, Missing factors of h_k on last two factors of Eq. (17.136)
p. 475 3a) \vec v_{\vec k}= -- \vec v_{--\vec k}
p. 477, Equations (17.187) and (17.188) miss minus signs for (g-f) and sign of rhs of (17.189) is wrong. Add a term of the form D \partial f/\partial \mu to the right hand side of Equation (17.190), and neglect a term proportional to \partial^2 f/\partial \mu^2 during the calculation.
p. 482, Equation (18.2); in the comment, d[k] should be [dk]
p. 490, "a simple picture of an insulator gives way" should be "a simple picture of how an insulator gives way."
p. 494, Equation (18.47); assume the lattice spacing is unity.
pp. 494, 495, 498, and 501, G appears sometimes without the hat indicating it is an operator, and on pages 495 and 496 without the subscript 0 needed to be consistent with page 494.
p. 495, Equations (18.52) and (18.53). Equation (18.52) is missing an overall factor of 1/\sqrt{E2-4t2}. In addition, it is correct as given only if E>2t. Otherwise, it needs an overall minus sign, and the square root acquires an extra minus sign. The final factor of t in (18.53) should be replaced by 2t.
p. 495, Equation (18.56), the term 4t needs a minus sign. "computations involves elliptic integrals" should be "computations involve elliptic integrals."
p. 496, Equation (18.58) has an extra minus sign.
p. 497, Equation (18.72) g should be U0, and an extra power of U0 is missing on the right hand side.
p. 501, Equation (18.88). Argument of second theta function should be W/2+U.
p. 502, Equations (18.93) and (18.94). The factors of m on the far left should be \lambda. In Equation (18.96) there is a missing factor of t on the right.
p. 504, Equation (18.105). Missing t in numerator inside delta function. Equation (18.108), final tg should be tg'.
pp. 506 and 507. The sign of the \beta function is not treated consistently. The definition I give in Equation (18.116) is the one used by Abrahams et al, but much of the text and Figure 18.8 (A) do not include the minus sign in the definition. The cleanest cure is to eliminate the minus signs from Equations (18.116)--(18.119) and on the y axis title of Figure 18.8 (A). Leave the discussion and drawing as it is. The last term in Equation (18.119) is confusing. What it means is this: the function R(L/L0) gives resistance as a function of L/L0. The inverse of this function gives L/L0 as a function of resistance, or equivalently log of resistance. The point of (18.119) is to express L/L0 as a function of ln R through the integral of the \beta function.
p. 520, Equation (19.2), the constant is 3.6 x 10-4.
p. 525, In comment to Equation (19.12) 1/kT=40/eV.
p. 529, Equation (19.21) Masses in denominator should have square roots.
p. 530, Equation (19.27) subtract ½ kT \ln MC from last term.
p. 532, Vicinity of (19.33), the symbol n temporarily denotes total electron density, and is confused with the same symbol being used for conduction electron density.
p. 535, Before Equation (19.41), VA should be eVA. Equation (19.42), there is a missing right brace after eVA . Equation (19.43) is missing a factor of e. Equation (19.45) does not vanish as it should when VA vanishes. The cure is to subtract \exp-\beta \phi_b rather than 1 within the square braces.
p. 536, Second sentence, add EC--\mu rather than subtracting.
pp. 538-539, From Equation (19.50) up to and including (19.53), NA and ND are interchanged. In the discussion at the bottom of page 539, xn and xp move opposite to the directions stated, and in final sentence, the depletion region grows when claimed to shrink.
p. 541, Equation (19.69) should include contribution from ions as in (19.51).
p. 545, bottom paragraph, the currents flowing into the p and n regions come from external leads.
p. 552, Equation (19.83). Sum over kx rather than \vec k.
p. 552, Equation (19.87). In note, the voltage is -\delta\mu/e.
p. 554, near bottom aF is attofarad, not anofarad
p. 571. To get from (20.45)
to (20.46) notice also that the principal part of
\int_0^\infty
d\omega' 1/(\omega'^2-\omega^2) is zero.
p. 573, Equation (20.54). U(t) should be U(t').
p. 576, I forgot to mention that Equation (20.67) (and almost everything else on the page) is the Kubo-Greenwood formula.
p. 577, Equation (20.77) should indicate explicitly a spin sum.
p. 579, Equation (20.90), integrate over exp[--i q . r]. Ignore <q|\rho>.
p. 580, Equation (20.91) should be U(r,t)=U(q,w)\exp(iqr-iwt)/V. Equations (20.92) and (20.93) should indicate explicitly a spin sum.
p. 588, Equations (21.13), (21.14), and (21.17) are all missing a factor of 1/V.
p. 593, Equation (21.30). Need extra minus sign. The binding energies specified by Equation (21.27) are negative.
p. 602, Equation (21.48) \psi_2 is missing a factor of x.
p. 603, The two atomic states are 1S and 2P; 2P is once referred to as P12 and 1S as 2S.
p. 605, Equation (21.57) is missing e2.
p. 606, Equation (21.6) ¾ should be 3/8. In (21.62) d should be p.
p. 614, Equation (22.13), the normal mode is actually u1-u2.
p. 622, Equation (22.52), \sinh^{-1}[argument] should be (-i\pi/2+\cosh^{-1}[argument]). In (22.55), replace \sinh by \cosh.
p. 630, Equation (22.63). m in the denominator should be M.
p. 630, Equation (22.65). M should be in numerator not in denominator.
p. 631, Equation (22.66). Missing vertical rule after matrix element.
p. 631, Equation (22.67) M should be in numerator, not denominator.
p. 638, Equation (23.6). The right hand side of the equation is missing a minus sign.
p. 639, Equation (23.9), the denominator is \omega^2.
p. 640, Equation (23.15). -v.q should be - iv.q, and the 1/\tau term should also be negative.
p. 641, Equation (23.21) \epsilon_{\alpha\beta}=1+... should be \epsilon_{\alpha\beta}=\delta_{\alpha\beta}+....
p. 648. Equations (23.47) and (23.49) are missing factors of 1/V.
p. 650, Equation (23.53), inside \omega_1, replace the minus-or-plus by minus. In (23.55), k0^2 term should have plus sign.
p. 663, Equation (23.70), swap f0 and f1.
p. 664, first paragraph, references to 4d states should be 3d states.
p. 665, (23.77) equals 0, and in last line \epsilon_{yy} should be \epsilon_{xy}.
p. 666 Equations (23.80) and (23.81) replace e by -e.
p. 672, line after (24.7), should be 4\pi\chi=\mu-1.
p. 673, Equations (24.13) and (24.14). The time derivative of D is missing a factor of 1/c.
p. 686, Equation (24.61), the factor of a^2 in the denominator should be outside the square root. Energy is per area.
p. 694. In (24.84) A4 is a4. In (24.87) -1/3 is 1/3.
p. 697. Divide rhs of (24.95) by r.
p. 700. Equation (24.114), \delta is \Delta.
p. 710, Equation (25.4). A should have vector sign on top.
p. 710, Equation (25.5). The term in Equation (25.1) that remains when B=0 has accidentally been omitted.
p. 710, Equation (25.7). The expression is in units of eV.
p. 713, Equation (25.21) has an extra factor of Jz
p. 720, Equation (25.53). The argument of D is \nu not n.
p. 721, Equation (25.55) and comment to (25.62); again \nu should replace n. Factors of V missing in Equations (25.57), (25.58), and (25.63). Missing kBT in (15.62) and extra kBT and missing minus sign in (25.63).
p. 724. Equation (25.72), sign of term involving A is wrong.
p. 725, Equations (25.73)--(7.75) are missing 1/\hbar in exponent. Equation (25.76) \nu should be \kappa.
p. 727, Equations (25.90) and (25.91) need extra minus sign in exponent.
p. 730, Equations (25.104) and (25.106) c should be in numerator.
p. 735, Before Equation (25.122) take B to point along -z.
p. 736, Equation (25.128). In the exponential, z0 should be zl.
p. 741, Equation (25.157) six final terms on lhs should be multiplied by R.
p. 742, Equation (25.160) third term from left should not have factor of 1/\nu.
p. 748 Equation (26.15) l0 is l.
p. 754, set \hbar to 1 everywhere on this page. Reverse the sign of Equation (26.42c)
p. 752, Equation (26.30), only the first and third of the c operators are creation operators; 2 and 4 are destruction.
p. 755, Equation (26.43), set \hbar to 1. The correct relation is [S^+, S^-] = 2 S^z. In following paragraph, it is a2^\dag a2 that cannot have negative eigenvalues.
p. 756. Equations (26.52) and (26.54), replace 4J by 2J.
p. 782, Wiegmann (1980). The solution is at T=0, not t=0.
p. 784, Equations (27.3) and (27.4). A second cross product should be acting on the left hand side of the equation. Before Equation (27.7), z<0 should be z>0.
p. 784, Equation (27.6) m is in denominator and not numerator of fraction.
p. 785, After Equation (27.9), reference to Equation (27.11) should be reference to Equation 24.3. Equation (27.10), the factor of ½ should follow the sum.
p. 786, Equations (27.11) and (27.12), the subscript on A should be \beta, and the sum should be over \beta only.
p. 787, Equation (27.23), first factor of 4\pi should be omitted.
p. 788, Throughout section, interpret m as an effective mass m^\star
p. 791, preceding Equation (27.40). The right hand side constant is - ½ , not ½.
p. 792, Equation (27.43). The final term on the right hand side needs an extra minus sign. Equation (27.44), need extra factor of ½. Equation (27.46), subtract rather than adding last term.
p. 797, Equation (27.68) and preceding discussion. Factor in front of integral is missing additional factor of 1/c. Equation (27.66), missing exponential factor in second term.
pp. 799 and 800, In Section 27.2.8, replace \Phi_0 / 2 throughout by \Phi_0 / 4\pi .
p. 800, Equation (27.78), need extra factor of 4\pi/\Phi_0 multiplying integral.
p. 801, The sign conventions are in trouble. Must take G(A+\grad \chi ,V - \dot\chi/c ) in (27.82), and in point 1. at top of page. Equation (27.84), needs extra minus signs on right hand sides of both (a) and (b).
p. 802 In discussion after (27.90) must multiply line integral of A by extra factor of 2 / \Phi_0
p. 808, Equation (27.117) needs overall factor of ½ on right hand side.
p. 811 and 812, Equations (27.133) and (27.140) need additional factors of ½ for four-Fermion terms.
p. 813, Equation (27.145), eliminate factor of 1/N!. Equation (27.148), last c_k^\dag is c_{--k}^\dag.
p. 814, Equation (27.156) on lhs \mu should be \mu N.
p. 815, Equation (27.165), factor of ½ should come outside bracket.
p. 816, Equation (27.173), sum over k', not k.
p. 817, Equation (27.181) and preceding paragraph, order of two Fermion operators should be reversed in all terms. Equation (27.183) third term, replace k by k'. Equation (27.184) sum middle two terms only over k.
p. 819, Equation (27.199) sum on lhs should only be over k'.
p. 820, Equation (27.203) excess U0 in brackets.
p. 821, Equation (27.208), lhs is really H-\mu N. Sum last term over q.
p. 823, Equation (27.219b) replace u by v. In Equation (27.220a&b) reverse sign of \mu.
p. 824, before Equation (27.221a), replace k by k'. Equation (27.224a) \Delta is \Delta^*. Equation (27.227) add rather than subtracting term with A.
p. 831, Equation (27.247), A goes to A +\grad \chi.
p. 834, Equation (27.253), \pi should be replaced by 2\pi both top and bottom.
p. 836, Equation (27.260), reverse sign on right hand side.
p. 844, Equations (A.14)
through (A.16). Wherever (1-z2)
appears it should actually be (1-z)2.
In (A.15) the numerator is
1+z2N-2zN
p. 845, Equation (A.32). The sentence prior to (A.31) should read, "An additional result in one dimension follows from computing". (A.32) is completely wrong. The factor involving the sine functions makes no sense at all, and the next term should be aN \sum_n \delta(r-nN)=L \delta(r), with the comment noting that r is restricted to the interval [0,L].
p. 846, Equation (A.33). The right hand side of the equation should be V \delta(\vec r) with no sum.
p. 846, Equation (A.43). F on the right hand side is better replaced by G.